启用调试日志并在响应中返回调试信息
为确保调节过程不影响睡眠连续性，研发团队对硬件系统进行了专项优化。
，更多细节参见向日葵
The harm affects others
The process of improving open-source data began by manually reviewing samples from each dataset. Typically, 5 to 10 minutes were sufficient to classify data as excellent-quality, good questions with wrong answers, low-quality questions or images, or high-quality with formatting errors. Excellent data was kept largely unchanged. For data with incorrect answers or poor-quality captions, we re-generated responses using GPT-4o and o4-mini, excluding datasets where error rates remained too high. Low-quality questions proved difficult to salvage, but when the images themselves were high quality, we repurposed them as seeds for new caption or visual question answering (VQA) data. Datasets with fundamentally flawed images were excluded entirely. We also fixed a surprisingly large number of formatting and logical errors across widely used open-source datasets.
SelectWhat's included